Posted by Martin on September 6, 2010, 6:15 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309450/Fed-residents-demand-action-neighbours-35ft-Leyland-cypress-trees.html?ITO 90
--
Martin
Posted by Bob Hobden on September 6, 2010, 6:39 pm
"Martin" wrote
>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309450/Fed-residents-demand-action-neighbours-35ft-Leyland-cypress-trees.html?ITO 90
I cannot believe they have been allowed to grow so big right next to houses,
has nobody seen a dry conifer tree do up in flames in hot dry weather like
we had this year. It would take his house and that of the neighbours with
it. In these days of "Health and Safety" how come that has been missed.
AS for the owner, there's more out than in.
--
Regards
Bob Hobden
W.of London. UK
Posted by Martin on September 6, 2010, 6:46 pm
>"Martin" wrote
>>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309450/Fed-residents-demand-action-neighbours-35ft-Leyland-cypress-trees.html?ITO 90
>I cannot believe they have been allowed to grow so big right next to houses,
>has nobody seen a dry conifer tree do up in flames in hot dry weather like
>we had this year. It would take his house and that of the neighbours with
>it. In these days of "Health and Safety" how come that has been missed.
>AS for the owner, there's more out than in.
Haven't they being growing whilst the local authority has been having a long
legal action against the owner? It is not clear to me how he accesses his house
nor why he thinks a wall is a greenhouse.
--
Martin
Posted by Sacha on September 6, 2010, 6:51 pm
>
>>
>>
>> "Martin" wrote
>>>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309450/Fed-residents-demand-action-neighbours-35ft-Leyland-cypress-trees.html?ITO 90
I
>>>
>> cannot believe they have been allowed to grow so big right next to houses,
>> has nobody seen a dry conifer tree do up in flames in hot dry weather like
>> we had this year. It would take his house and that of the neighbours with
>> it. In these days of "Health and Safety" how come that has been missed.
>> AS for the owner, there's more out than in.
>
> Haven't they being growing whilst the local authority has been having a long
> legal action against the owner? It is not clear to me how he accesses his house
> nor why he thinks a wall is a greenhouse.
He uses the back door, presumably. What I don't understand is why his
neighbours' insurers haven't been invoked!
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon
Posted by Ian B on September 6, 2010, 8:11 pm
Sacha wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Martin" wrote
>>>>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309450/Fed-residents-demand-action-neighbours-35ft-Leyland-cypress-trees.html?ITO 90
> I
>>>>
>>> cannot believe they have been allowed to grow so big right next to
>>> houses, has nobody seen a dry conifer tree do up in flames in hot
>>> dry weather like we had this year. It would take his house and that
>>> of the neighbours with it. In these days of "Health and Safety" how
>>> come that has been missed. AS for the owner, there's more out than
>>> in.
>>
>> Haven't they being growing whilst the local authority has been
>> having a long legal action against the owner? It is not clear to me
>> how he accesses his house nor why he thinks a wall is a greenhouse.
> He uses the back door, presumably. What I don't understand is why his
> neighbours' insurers haven't been invoked!
Looks like a case of NIMFYism :oD
Ian
XML site map