Posted by Dead Paul on January 7, 2010, 4:25 pm
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/
January 6th, 2010
Gerald Warner:
Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been
dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning
the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative…
“Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city,
town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions
correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past
week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change
buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their
credibility is 20 degrees below zero.
Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker
with their hands high and “fess up”. Patronisingly fobbing off the
public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly
they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain
Britain’s Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has
frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of –25C? Is it the
Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951?
The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas
pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the
random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet
fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective
samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it
to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal
despoliation of citizens.
2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance
of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green
taxes? We won’t pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in
office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is
one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and
control our political masters – provided Britons have the will to break
with the two-party system.
Due to the rise of smaller parties – itself the consequence of the
misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus – it is a buyer’s market.
The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming
scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesn’t matter how ingrained
one’s loyalty may once have been to one of the “major” parties, the
time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned,
since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an
anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public.
The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people
realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them
nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually
obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging
New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall
forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That
is the answer: Zero Tolerance of “Green” agendas.
Posted by Fred on January 7, 2010, 4:55 pm
Dead Paul wrote:
>
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/
> January 6th, 2010
> Gerald Warner:
>
> Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been
> dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning
> the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative…
>
> “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city,
> town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions
> correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past
> week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change
> buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their
> credibility is 20 degrees below zero.
>
> Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker
> with their hands high and “fess up”. Patronisingly fobbing off the
> public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly
> they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain
> Britain’s Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has
> frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of –25C? Is it the
> Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951?
>
> The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas
> pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the
> random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet
> fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective
> samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it
> to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal
> despoliation of citizens.
>
> 2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance
> of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green
> taxes? We won’t pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in
> office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is
> one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and
> control our political masters – provided Britons have the will to break
> with the two-party system.
>
> Due to the rise of smaller parties – itself the consequence of the
> misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus – it is a buyer’s market.
> The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming
> scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesn’t matter how ingrained
> one’s loyalty may once have been to one of the “major” parties, the
> time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned,
> since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an
> anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public.
>
> The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people
> realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them
> nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually
> obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging
> New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall
> forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That
> is the answer: Zero Tolerance of “Green” agendas.
Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media.
Posted by Alan Johnson on January 8, 2010, 2:05 am
> Dead Paul wrote:
>>
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/
> Fred wrote:
> Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media.
Yeah, that's about what I would expect from "the mainstream media", and
the Telegraph in particular: don't know the difference between climate
and weather.
Posted by Doug on January 8, 2010, 2:52 am
> Dead Paul wrote:
> >http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-scie ...
> > January 6th, 2010
> > Gerald Warner:
> > Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been
> > dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning
> > the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative
> > Climate science is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city,
> > town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions
> > correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past
> > week. This is the exceptionally mild winter that the climate change
> > buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their
> > credibility is 20 degrees below zero.
> > Yet nothing shames them, nothing persuades them to come out of the bunker
> > with their hands high and fess up. Patronisingly fobbing off the
> > public with fabricated excuses has become second nature to them. Latterly
> > they have been concocting alibis about the Gulf Stream to explain
> > Britains Arctic conditions. Uh-huh? Is it the Gulf Stream that has
> > frozen the Vistula and given Poland a temperature of 25C? Is it the
> > Gulf Stream that has caused the worst blizzards in Beijing since 1951?
> > The entire Northern Hemisphere is frozen. The world looks like a Christmas
> > pudding with icing on the top. That is completely normal, part of the
> > random climate fluctuations with which our ancestors were familiar. Yet
> > fraudulent scientists have gained millions of pounds by taking selective
> > samples of natural climate change, whipping up a Grande Peur and using it
> > to advance the cause of world government, state control and fiscal
> > despoliation of citizens.
> > 2010 should be the year when all that ends. It is time for Zero Tolerance
> > of AGW fraudsters and their political masters. It is time to say: Green
> > taxes? We wont pay them. Nor will we vote for or permit to remain in
> > office any politician or party that supports the AGW fraud. This year is
> > one of those rare occasions when we have an opportunity to punish and
> > control our political masters provided Britons have the will to break
> > with the two-party system.
> > Due to the rise of smaller parties itself the consequence of the
> > misgovernment of the Lab/Lib/Con consensus it is a buyers market.
> > The rule of thumb should be: any party that supports the global warming
> > scam is ineligible for our votes. It doesnt matter how ingrained
> > ones loyalty may once have been to one of the major parties, the
> > time has come to impose the popular will on politicians who have learned,
> > since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965, that by forming an
> > anti-democratic consensus they can dictate to the public.
> > The coming general election is going to be an intelligence test. If people
> > realise that voting for the slightly less objectionable choice gets them
> > nowhere, that by holding out for what they really want they can actually
> > obtain it, then we may be able to liberate ourselves from the tree-hugging
> > New/Blue Labour consensus. If we fail to rise to that challenge we shall
> > forfeit the right to complain about five more years of PC oppression. That
> > is the answer: Zero Tolerance of Green agendas.
> Very refreshing to finally read this in the mainstream media.
Yes you can carry on with your polluting now with a clear conscience,
until the next warm spell.
BTW, check this out, particularly the maps.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8447262.stm
Doug.
Posted by the gods have made us mad on January 7, 2010, 4:57 pm
>
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/
> January 6th, 2010
> Gerald Warner:
> Wow! That Copenhagen package really worked. Global warming has been
> dramatically reversed. In fact, if Al Gore could see his way to turning
> the heat back up just a little, most of us would be deeply appreciative…
> “Climate science” is the oxymoron of the century. There is not a city,
> town or hamlet in the country that has had its weather conditions
> correctly forecast, over periods as short as 12 hours, during the past
> week. This is the “exceptionally mild winter” that the climate change
> buffoons warned us would occur as a consequence of global warming. Their
> credibility is 20 degrees below zero.<<
BBC Radio 4 news was pressed into service earlier today to explain the
conundrum to increasingly sceptical plebs.
The 6pm bulletin went to some lengths to explain that what we are now
experiencing is 'weather' - but that the grave problem of 'climate' still
remains ;)
Here's sobering link to the plight of Peruvian Indians - who are suffering
badly from increasingly long and bitter winters.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/03/peru-mountain-farmers-winter-cold
The suffering of their children is airily ascribed to the Indian's own
'micro climate', which has produced freezing temperatures in a rapidly
warming world.
I can foresee 'microclimate' becoming the explanation of choice when the
Warmist's are confronted by growing evidence that things are getting colder,
not hotter.
This snow, for example, is just down to the UK's microclimate.....