Posted by Terry Fields on March 6, 2010, 9:39 am
Roo wrote:
>You know, I've got to agree with Terry's initial comments.
>There seemed to be more excitement and enthusiasm for the new series
>starting from the pre-programme announcer.
LOL
>It's been a long, hard winter (some would say it's not over yet...),
>but, as Terry says, there was no 'teasers' to not just the season, but
>even that programme.
>Indeed, it was almost as if it was a mid-season programme, with no
>forethought in informing us what was coming up, and why.
That was my thinking. They did say that it had been a long winter, and
mentioned the 46 frosts they'd had. Since weather is so important to a
garden, more could have been made of this - it isn't as if they didn't
have any warning, after all. But we got shown one plant that had
suffered, and Carol's appropriate snowdrop piece.
Round here the fields (and gardens) are practically waterlogged, and a
few days of sun and wind have made little impact on that. It must be
the same over much of the country, but this just wasn't taken up by
the programme.
>I think they should all start off by wishing us a happy new gardening
>year, and giving us something to look forward to over the next 30
>minutes, nay 30 episodes.
Oh, exactly my point. It just launched straight off, and we still have
no idea what's coming....but perhaps on looking back, they've done
that in order to keep the schedule 'flexible', while monitoring the
feedback. No hostages to fortune, perhaps.
>Oh, and it could've done with more music at times, which certainly
>helps to raise the gardening spirit !
Just so long as it isn't the "...what a wonderful world..." variety!
TF
Posted by Martin on March 6, 2010, 11:26 am
wrote:
>Roo wrote:
>>You know, I've got to agree with Terry's initial comments.
>>
>>There seemed to be more excitement and enthusiasm for the new series
>>starting from the pre-programme announcer.
>LOL
>>It's been a long, hard winter (some would say it's not over yet...),
>>but, as Terry says, there was no 'teasers' to not just the season, but
>>even that programme.
>>Indeed, it was almost as if it was a mid-season programme, with no
>>forethought in informing us what was coming up, and why.
>That was my thinking. They did say that it had been a long winter, and
>mentioned the 46 frosts they'd had. Since weather is so important to a
>garden, more could have been made of this - it isn't as if they didn't
>have any warning, after all. But we got shown one plant that had
>suffered, and Carol's appropriate snowdrop piece.
Be glad it wasn't Toby Buckland's cod piece.
>Round here the fields (and gardens) are practically waterlogged, and a
>few days of sun and wind have made little impact on that. It must be
>the same over much of the country, but this just wasn't taken up by
>the programme.
>>I think they should all start off by wishing us a happy new gardening
>>year, and giving us something to look forward to over the next 30
>>minutes, nay 30 episodes.
We could have a 15 minute weather forecast embedded in the programme and a piece
about how to fudge climate change databases for amateurs.
>Oh, exactly my point. It just launched straight off, and we still have
>no idea what's coming....but perhaps on looking back, they've done
>that in order to keep the schedule 'flexible', while monitoring the
>feedback. No hostages to fortune, perhaps.
Perhaps they did it to increase the gardening content and to reduce the mindless
waffle that was in the previous series.
>>Oh, and it could've done with more music at times, which certainly
>>helps to raise the gardening spirit !
>Just so long as it isn't the "...what a wonderful world..." variety!
It was sad not to see how very expensive gardening tools could be used as door
handles on a brightly painted simple 400 square metre garden shed.
>TF
--
Martin
Posted by Janet Baraclough on March 6, 2010, 2:29 pm
> We could have a 15 minute weather forecast embedded in the programme
> and a piece
> about how to fudge climate change databases for amateurs.
Fudge? Lets include a dental hygiene soundbite. Plus a section on
diabetes.
Janet
Posted by Martin on March 6, 2010, 6:12 pm
wrote:
>> We could have a 15 minute weather forecast embedded in the programme
>> and a piece
>> about how to fudge climate change databases for amateurs.
> Fudge? Lets include a dental hygiene soundbite. Plus a section on
>diabetes.
LOL
--
Martin
Posted by Janet Baraclough on March 6, 2010, 12:27 pm
> Round here the fields (and gardens) are practically waterlogged, and a
> few days of sun and wind have made little impact on that. It must be
> the same over much of the country, but this just wasn't taken up by
> the programme.
Why should it be?
GW, like gardening posters here, know that there is no "must be
the same conditions over the rest of the country".
We all have different weather as posts here constantly demonstrate
Janet
>There seemed to be more excitement and enthusiasm for the new series
>starting from the pre-programme announcer.
LOL
>It's been a long, hard winter (some would say it's not over yet...),
>but, as Terry says, there was no 'teasers' to not just the season, but
>even that programme.
>Indeed, it was almost as if it was a mid-season programme, with no
>forethought in informing us what was coming up, and why.