Posted by Kevin Walton on October 22, 2004, 12:49 pm
Hi all
I know from a quick read that a lot of you are not keen on cordless
chainsaws for a number of different reasons, but I have to say that in
my experience I personally feel that they do fill a valuable gap
between loppers and a Petrol / Electric chainsaw. It may be my fault,
but I don't get on with a bow saw for anything bigger than say 2.5"
diameter, the cordless chain saw would do 2.5" with ease and cope with
3.5".
I had a cheap brand cordless chainsaw from Argos this summer and it
was great - it had limitations in branch size and battery life, but it
became invaluable. Unfortunately last month it died on me and the two
retailers that I know stocked them (Argos & B&Q) in the UK both say
they are discontinued.
Does anyone know if they are still sold in the UK anywhere, or does
anyone in the UK have one that is sitting around that they want to
sell, or is anyone going on hols to the US and want to bring me one
back for a profit? :)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&itemC32030520
Cheers
Kev
Posted by Franz Heymann on October 22, 2004, 3:44 pm
> Hi all
> I know from a quick read that a lot of you are not keen on cordless
> chainsaws for a number of different reasons, but I have to say that
in
> my experience I personally feel that they do fill a valuable gap
> between loppers and a Petrol / Electric chainsaw. It may be my
fault,
> but I don't get on with a bow saw for anything bigger than say 2.5"
> diameter, the cordless chain saw would do 2.5" with ease and cope
with
> 3.5".
Reciprocating electric saws are quite effective at dealing with limbs
up to 2 or 3 inches diameter and are much safer than chain saws.
[snip]
Franz
Posted by Mike Lyle on October 22, 2004, 4:07 pm
Franz Heymann wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I know from a quick read that a lot of you are not keen on
cordless
>> chainsaws for a number of different reasons, but I have to say
that
>> in my experience I personally feel that they do fill a valuable
gap
>> between loppers and a Petrol / Electric chainsaw. It may be my
>> fault, but I don't get on with a bow saw for anything bigger than
>> say 2.5" diameter, the cordless chain saw would do 2.5" with ease
>> and cope with
>> 3.5".
> Reciprocating electric saws are quite effective at dealing with
limbs
> up to 2 or 3 inches diameter and are much safer than chain saws.
Having had the full ATB training course on chain saws, I'm horrified
by what I see. Poor maintenance (or none), insufficient protective
gear (or none), clumsy technique (or none). I seriously think there
should be a licence to drive one of those things. I agree on the
reciprocating saw; but on the other hand, a bow saw with a brand new
blade is good enough for _most_ gardeners: what does it matter if it
takes five minutes to cut through a branch instead of thirty seconds?
If one needs a rest and a cup of tea half-way, well, why not?
Mike..
Posted by Nick Maclaren on October 22, 2004, 4:35 pm
>Having had the full ATB training course on chain saws, I'm horrified
>by what I see. Poor maintenance (or none), insufficient protective
>gear (or none), clumsy technique (or none). I seriously think there
>should be a licence to drive one of those things. I agree on the
>reciprocating saw; but on the other hand, a bow saw with a brand new
>blade is good enough for _most_ gardeners: what does it matter if it
>takes five minutes to cut through a branch instead of thirty seconds?
>If one needs a rest and a cup of tea half-way, well, why not?
Even for someone in fairly poor shape, 5 minutes with a bow saw is
quite a branch! c. 9" diameter apple or c. 6" diameter hawthorn,
I would reckon. Of course, I use a 30" bow saw with a blade in
decent condition ....
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Posted by Mike Lyle on October 22, 2004, 5:01 pm
Nick Maclaren wrote:
[...]
>> on the other hand, a bow saw with a brand new
>> blade is good enough for _most_ gardeners: what does it matter if
it
>> takes five minutes to cut through a branch instead of thirty
seconds?
>> If one needs a rest and a cup of tea half-way, well, why not?
> Even for someone in fairly poor shape, 5 minutes with a bow saw is
> quite a branch! c. 9" diameter apple or c. 6" diameter hawthorn,
> I would reckon. Of course, I use a 30" bow saw with a blade in
> decent condition ....
Sure: I'm just trying to put it in perspective. If one's got a lot to
do, then a power tool may be the answer; but most people probably
don't need petrol this, and electric that.
Mike.
> I know from a quick read that a lot of you are not keen on cordless
> chainsaws for a number of different reasons, but I have to say that
in
> my experience I personally feel that they do fill a valuable gap
> between loppers and a Petrol / Electric chainsaw. It may be my
fault,
> but I don't get on with a bow saw for anything bigger than say 2.5"
> diameter, the cordless chain saw would do 2.5" with ease and cope
with
> 3.5".