Posted by Baz on August 15, 2011, 1:00 pm
Given bail.
To return 12 Sept. 2011
How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
Baz
Posted by Sacha on August 15, 2011, 1:09 pm
> Given bail.
> To return 12 Sept. 2011
>
> How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
>
> Baz
They're perhaps a little over-stretched for room at present? If
there's some means by which you can protest, I hope you use it. And I
hope that CCTV is in place. I would be outraged and chewing the carpet
in your place, by now!
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon
Posted by Kay on August 15, 2011, 6:06 pm
On 15/08/2011 18:00, in article Xns9F42B73B13B47baz@69.16.176.253, "Baz"
> Given bail.
> To return 12 Sept. 2011
>
> How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
>
The Bail Act 1976 asserts a presumption in favour of bail for all people
awaiting trial except those on charges of murder, attempted murder,
manslaughter, rape or attempted rape. The legislation presumes that an
individual will be remanded on bail with various conditions attached unless
there are strong reasons to remand them into custody. These include:
- They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
- They have previous convictions for similar offences
- There are reasons to believe that they could disappear before their trial.
- They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
- There are reasons to believe that they may interfere with witnesses
- They is a belief they are likely to commit further offences before their
trial
Posted by Sacha on August 16, 2011, 5:04 am
>
>
>
> On 15/08/2011 18:00, in article Xns9F42B73B13B47baz@69.16.176.253, "Baz"
>
>> Given bail.
>> To return 12 Sept. 2011
>>
>> How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
>>
> The Bail Act 1976 asserts a presumption in favour of bail for all people
> awaiting trial except those on charges of murder, attempted murder,
> manslaughter, rape or attempted rape. The legislation presumes that an
> individual will be remanded on bail with various conditions attached unless
> there are strong reasons to remand them into custody. These include:
>
> - They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
>
> - They have previous convictions for similar offences
>
> - There are reasons to believe that they could disappear before their trial.
>
> - They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
>
> - There are reasons to believe that they may interfere with witnesses
>
> - They is a belief they are likely to commit further offences before their
> trial
>
I thought Baz's perp qualified for most of those. But as a judge has
just handed down an 11 month sentence instead of a 12 month one to a
drug dealer, thus avoiding his third deportation from this country,
it's hardly surprising most of us have given up any hope of real
justice for real criminals.
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon
Posted by Martin on August 16, 2011, 5:15 am
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15/08/2011 18:00, in article Xns9F42B73B13B47baz@69.16.176.253, "Baz"
>>
>>> Given bail.
>>> To return 12 Sept. 2011
>>>
>>> How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
>>>
>> The Bail Act 1976 asserts a presumption in favour of bail for all people
>> awaiting trial except those on charges of murder, attempted murder,
>> manslaughter, rape or attempted rape. The legislation presumes that an
>> individual will be remanded on bail with various conditions attached unless
>> there are strong reasons to remand them into custody. These include:
>>
>> - They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
>>
>> - They have previous convictions for similar offences
>>
>> - There are reasons to believe that they could disappear before their trial.
>>
>> - They have been accused of carrying out a particularly serious offence
>>
>> - There are reasons to believe that they may interfere with witnesses
>>
>> - They is a belief they are likely to commit further offences before their
>> trial
>>
>I thought Baz's perp qualified for most of those. But as a judge has
>just handed down an 11 month sentence instead of a 12 month one to a
>drug dealer, thus avoiding his third deportation from this country,
>it's hardly surprising most of us have given up any hope of real
>justice for real criminals.
Bloody Daily Mail readers! :-)
--
Martin
> To return 12 Sept. 2011
>
> How bad do you have to be to be refused bail?
>
> Baz