Posted by whatever on December 28, 2004, 11:18 am
Hello. I wonder if anyone can answer a possibly dumb question - it's a
matter of settling a dispute. Does a frequently sniffed flower have
less
fragrance than one that is not sniffed? A friend of mine insists that
roses at a convenient height for smelling always smell less intense
than
ones that you have to go out of your way to smell. He thinks that with
each sniff, some of the fragrance disappears and is not replaced. I
don't
agree. If anyone has any knowledge (or even an opinion) about this, I'd
be interested in hearing it. Thanks in advance.
Posted by dr-solo on December 28, 2004, 12:08 pm
http://www.cf.ac.uk/biosi/staff/jacob/teaching/sensory/olfactres.html
it is called habituation, basically our smell receptors get saturated and the
brain
turns them off for that smell, the receptors wont fire again for a while.
the rose is continually putting out the odor has nothing to do with being
smelled or
not smelled by humans. Ingrid
>Hello. I wonder if anyone can answer a possibly dumb question - it's a
>matter of settling a dispute. Does a frequently sniffed flower have
>less
>fragrance than one that is not sniffed? A friend of mine insists that
>roses at a convenient height for smelling always smell less intense
>than
>ones that you have to go out of your way to smell. He thinks that with
>each sniff, some of the fragrance disappears and is not replaced. I
>don't
>agree. If anyone has any knowledge (or even an opinion) about this, I'd
>be interested in hearing it. Thanks in advance.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.
Posted by paghat on December 28, 2004, 12:47 pm
> Hello. I wonder if anyone can answer a possibly dumb question - it's a
> matter of settling a dispute. Does a frequently sniffed flower have
> less
> fragrance than one that is not sniffed? A friend of mine insists that
> roses at a convenient height for smelling always smell less intense
> than
> ones that you have to go out of your way to smell. He thinks that with
> each sniff, some of the fragrance disappears and is not replaced. I
> don't
> agree. If anyone has any knowledge (or even an opinion) about this, I'd
> be interested in hearing it. Thanks in advance.
That's so funny. Ask your pal if an often-smelled cat turd also gets its
odor sucked out of it by noses.
-paghat the ratgirl
--
"Of what are you afraid, my child?" inquired the kindly teacher.
"Oh, sir! The flowers, they are wild," replied the timid creature.
-from Peter Newell's "Wild Flowers"
Visit the Garden of Paghat the Ratgirl: http://www.paghat.com
Posted by Eyebright on December 28, 2004, 8:57 pm
whatever Wrote:
> Does a frequently sniffed flower have
> less
> fragrance than one that is not sniffed?
theres a thing a Viola...V odorata maybe ..which smells intense whe
first sniffed then ya nose cant get the scent again for 3 or 4 hour
coz the scent did somethin to ya nose...this is a fact
--
Eyebright
>matter of settling a dispute. Does a frequently sniffed flower have
>less
>fragrance than one that is not sniffed? A friend of mine insists that
>roses at a convenient height for smelling always smell less intense
>than
>ones that you have to go out of your way to smell. He thinks that with
>each sniff, some of the fragrance disappears and is not replaced. I
>don't
>agree. If anyone has any knowledge (or even an opinion) about this, I'd
>be interested in hearing it. Thanks in advance.