Posted by Susan on June 27, 2010, 1:04 pm
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/27/2010 12:39 PM, brooklyn1 wrote:
> Shearing is a lot different from topping. Most conifers respond
> positively to shearing but few react well to topping. There are many
> varieties of arborvitae, had the OP submitted a photo that would help
> immeasurably to advise. Topping most of an older tall variety would
> result in many years of looking at a stumpy bush... will likely slowly
> die from not being able to heal so large a wound, would lose strength
> and be prone to disease and insect attack. I would remove it and
> plant something more suitable for the space alloted.
> http://www.evergreenplantnursery.com/Arborvitae-Thuja-s/1.htm
I could be wrong, but the OP seemed to indicate a slow, gradual
reduction in height. The shrubs could always be removed and dumped
after gradual shortening and shearing if they died, and they might
thrive. Why not take the time to find out?
As to wounds, I've seen ice and snow damage to large arborvitae branches
and seen them bounce back with vitality (not mine, I brush it all off as
fast as I can, lucky so far), so it's certainly within the realm of
possiblities.
Susan
Posted by Susan on June 27, 2010, 1:19 pm
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/27/2010 1:04 PM, Susan wrote:
> I could be wrong, but the OP seemed to indicate a slow, gradual
> reduction in height. The shrubs could always be removed and dumped after
> gradual shortening and shearing if they died, and they might thrive. Why
> not take the time to find out?
> As to wounds, I've seen ice and snow damage to large arborvitae branches
> and seen them bounce back with vitality (not mine, I brush it all off as
> fast as I can, lucky so far), so it's certainly within the realm of
> possiblities.
This suggests that the OP could just go ahead and cut those babies hard:
http://www.aboutarborvitae.com/pruning_arborvitae.shtml
Other sites, too, discuss pruning, shearing and topping to keep neat
arborvitae hedges, so it's not so deadly after all, I guess.
Susan
Posted by brooklyn1 on June 27, 2010, 2:07 pm
>x-no-archive: yes
>On 6/27/2010 12:39 PM, brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Shearing is a lot different from topping. Most conifers respond
>> positively to shearing but few react well to topping. There are many
>> varieties of arborvitae, had the OP submitted a photo that would help
>> immeasurably to advise. Topping most of an older tall variety would
>> result in many years of looking at a stumpy bush... will likely slowly
>> die from not being able to heal so large a wound, would lose strength
>> and be prone to disease and insect attack. I would remove it and
>> plant something more suitable for the space alloted.
>>
>> http://www.evergreenplantnursery.com/Arborvitae-Thuja-s/1.htm
>I could be wrong, but the OP seemed to indicate a slow, gradual
>reduction in height. The shrubs could always be removed and dumped
>after gradual shortening and shearing if they died, and they might
>thrive. Why not take the time to find out?
Why waste many years hoping for what most likely won't be... a new
arborvitae costs like $20. I wouldn't plant American arborvitae by an
entryway anyway, they grow too large, are used primarily for
screening... sometimes planted in groups for accent but require a very
large space. But why make the same mistake, I'd plant something
different, something with a more suitable growing habit, that would
fit with sun exposure. Large specimens don't work as foundation
plantings.
Posted by Susan on June 27, 2010, 4:46 pm
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/27/2010 2:07 PM, brooklyn1 wrote:
> Why waste many years hoping for what most likely won't be... a new
> arborvitae costs like $20. I wouldn't plant American arborvitae by an
> entryway anyway, they grow too large, are used primarily for
> screening... sometimes planted in groups for accent but require a very
> large space. But why make the same mistake, I'd plant something
> different, something with a more suitable growing habit, that would
> fit with sun exposure. Large specimens don't work as foundation
> plantings.
I think it depends upon how large your foundation bed is and what your
need is in terms of camouflage and balance, that's why I used the
emerald one. Bought it mature to cover up the fact that a meter is
hideously attached to the *front* of my home.
And from all I've now read, there's no harm in cutting them as much as
one needs to, so they're perfectly well suited as long as one maintains
them.
At the rate mine grows, years aren't necessary, at least not for an
established plant.
Susan
Posted by songbird on June 27, 2010, 8:06 pm
Phisherman wrote:
...
> All the pruned arborvitae I have seen do not look good at all,
> sometimes get worse the following years. Your landscaper is
> giving
> you very good advice.
they'll recover from a lot
of abuse if they don't get
too dried out in the winter
winds when their center
is exposed.
we have a few that get
munched on by the deer
and i just go along and
trim out the dead stuff
left behind. they sprout
new to fill in eventually
if left alone.
but i do agree with the
landscaper. they smell
nice, but they grow too
big for next to foundation
planting.
songbird
> positively to shearing but few react well to topping. There are many
> varieties of arborvitae, had the OP submitted a photo that would help
> immeasurably to advise. Topping most of an older tall variety would
> result in many years of looking at a stumpy bush... will likely slowly
> die from not being able to heal so large a wound, would lose strength
> and be prone to disease and insect attack. I would remove it and
> plant something more suitable for the space alloted.
> http://www.evergreenplantnursery.com/Arborvitae-Thuja-s/1.htm