Posted by Wildbilly on January 31, 2010, 1:02 pm
Other tasks could have replaced caring for plants, but this study shows
that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing home
residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and, extend
their lives.
Conversely, having no control (such as voting for change and, get Bush
III) should reduce their level of functioning and, shorten their lives.
http://capital2.capital.edu/faculty/jfournie/documents/Rodin_Judith.pdf
Long-Term Effects of a Control-Relevant Intervention With
the Institutionalized Aged
In a field study (Langer & Rodin, 1976),
we assessed the effects of an intervention designed
to encourage elderly nursing home
residents to make a greater number of choices
and to feel more control and responsibility
for day-to-day events. The study was intended
to determine whether the decline in
health, alertness, and activity that generally
occurs in the aged in nursing home settings
could be slowed or reversed by choice and
control manipulations that have been shown
to have beneficial effects in other contexts
The hospital administrator gave a talk to
residents in the experimental group emphasizing
their responsibility for themselves,
whereas the communication given to a second,
comparison group stressed the staff's
responsibility for them as patients. To bolster
the communication, residents in the experimental
group were offered plants to care
for, whereas residents in the comparison group
were given plants that were watered by the staff.
The data indicated that residents in the
responsibility-induced group became more
active and reported feeling happier than the
comparison group of residents, who were encouraged
to feel that the staff would care
for them and try to make them happy. Patients
in the responsibility-induced group
also showed a significant improvement in
alertness and increased behavioral involvement
in many different kinds of activities,
such as movie attendance, active socializing
with staff and friends, and contest participation.
In addition to collecting these multiple
questionnaire and behavioral measures at the
time, we have now been able to collect longterm
follow-up data on several variables, including
mortality.
Mortality
The most striking data were obtained in
death rate differences between the two treatment
groups. Taking the 18 months prior to
the original intervention as an arbitrary comparison
period, we found that the average
death rate during that period was 25% for
the entire nursing home. In the subsequent
18-month period following the intervention,
only 7 of the 47 subjects (15%) in the responsibility-
induced group died, whereas 13
of 44 subjects (30%) in the comparison
group had died. Using the arcsine transformation
for frequencies, this difference is
reliable (z = 3.14, p < .01).
Because these results were so startling,
we assessed other factors that might have
accounted for the differences. Unfortunately,
we simply cannot know everything about the
equivalency of these subjects prior to the
intervention. We do know that those who
died did not differ reliably in the length of
time that they had been institutionalized
or in their overall health status when the
study began. These means are presented in
Table 4, which also presents the nurses' evaluations
prior to the intervention. From these
ratings it is clear that the nurses had given
lower evaluations prior to the intervention to
those patients who subsequently died than to
those who were still living, F ( l , 48) = 7.73,
p < .01. The interaction between treatment
group and the life-death variable was not
significant, however.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines
Posted by Bill who putters on January 31, 2010, 2:19 pm
In article
> Other tasks could have replaced caring for plants, but this study shows
> that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing home
> residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and, extend
> their lives.
>
> Conversely, having no control (such as voting for change and, get Bush
> III) should reduce their level of functioning and, shorten their lives.
>
> http://capital2.capital.edu/faculty/jfournie/documents/Rodin_Judith.pdf
>
> Long-Term Effects of a Control-Relevant Intervention With
> the Institutionalized Aged
>
> In a field study (Langer & Rodin, 1976),
> we assessed the effects of an intervention designed
> to encourage elderly nursing home
> residents to make a greater number of choices
> and to feel more control and responsibility
> for day-to-day events. The study was intended
> to determine whether the decline in
> health, alertness, and activity that generally
> occurs in the aged in nursing home settings
> could be slowed or reversed by choice and
> control manipulations that have been shown
> to have beneficial effects in other contexts
>
> The hospital administrator gave a talk to
> residents in the experimental group emphasizing
> their responsibility for themselves,
> whereas the communication given to a second,
> comparison group stressed the staff's
> responsibility for them as patients. To bolster
> the communication, residents in the experimental
> group were offered plants to care
> for, whereas residents in the comparison group
> were given plants that were watered by the staff.
>
> The data indicated that residents in the
> responsibility-induced group became more
> active and reported feeling happier than the
> comparison group of residents, who were encouraged
> to feel that the staff would care
> for them and try to make them happy. Patients
> in the responsibility-induced group
> also showed a significant improvement in
> alertness and increased behavioral involvement
> in many different kinds of activities,
> such as movie attendance, active socializing
> with staff and friends, and contest participation.
> In addition to collecting these multiple
> questionnaire and behavioral measures at the
> time, we have now been able to collect longterm
> follow-up data on several variables, including
> mortality.
>
> Mortality
> The most striking data were obtained in
> death rate differences between the two treatment
> groups. Taking the 18 months prior to
> the original intervention as an arbitrary comparison
> period, we found that the average
> death rate during that period was 25% for
> the entire nursing home. In the subsequent
> 18-month period following the intervention,
> only 7 of the 47 subjects (15%) in the responsibility-
> induced group died, whereas 13
> of 44 subjects (30%) in the comparison
> group had died. Using the arcsine transformation
> for frequencies, this difference is
> reliable (z = 3.14, p < .01).
>
> Because these results were so startling,
> we assessed other factors that might have
> accounted for the differences. Unfortunately,
> we simply cannot know everything about the
> equivalency of these subjects prior to the
> intervention. We do know that those who
> died did not differ reliably in the length of
> time that they had been institutionalized
> or in their overall health status when the
> study began. These means are presented in
> Table 4, which also presents the nurses' evaluations
> prior to the intervention. From these
> ratings it is clear that the nurses had given
> lower evaluations prior to the intervention to
> those patients who subsequently died than to
> those who were still living, F ( l , 48) = 7.73,
> p < .01. The interaction between treatment
> group and the life-death variable was not
> significant, however.
Perhaps a few jewels buried in here.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life/#7
Taste below.
Bill
........................................................
³Living organisms are autopoietic systems: self-constructing,
self-maintaining, energy-transducing autocatalytic entities² in which
information needed to construct the next generation of organisms is
stabilized in nucleic acids that replicate within the context of whole
cells and work with other developmental resources during the life-cycles
of organisms, but they are also ³systems capable of evolving by
variation and natural selection: self-reproducing entities, whose forms
and functions are adapted to their environment and reflect the
composition and history of an ecosystem² (Harold 2001, 232)
It will be argued below that living systems may be defined as open
systems maintained in steady-states, far-from-equilibrium, due to
matter-energy flows in which informed (genetically) autocatalytic cycles
extract energy, build complex internal structures, allowing growth even
as they create greater entropy in their environments.
--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
Posted by Wildbilly on January 31, 2010, 5:22 pm
> In article
>
> > Other tasks could have replaced caring for plants, but this study shows
> > that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing home
> > residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and, extend
> > their lives.
> >
> > Conversely, having no control (such as voting for change and, get Bush
> > III) should reduce their level of functioning and, shorten their lives.
> >
> > http://capital2.capital.edu/faculty/jfournie/documents/Rodin_Judith.pdf
> >
> > Long-Term Effects of a Control-Relevant Intervention With
> > the Institutionalized Aged
> >
> > In a field study (Langer & Rodin, 1976),
> > we assessed the effects of an intervention designed
> > to encourage elderly nursing home
> > residents to make a greater number of choices
> > and to feel more control and responsibility
> > for day-to-day events. The study was intended
> > to determine whether the decline in
> > health, alertness, and activity that generally
> > occurs in the aged in nursing home settings
> > could be slowed or reversed by choice and
> > control manipulations that have been shown
> > to have beneficial effects in other contexts
> >
> > The hospital administrator gave a talk to
> > residents in the experimental group emphasizing
> > their responsibility for themselves,
> > whereas the communication given to a second,
> > comparison group stressed the staff's
> > responsibility for them as patients. To bolster
> > the communication, residents in the experimental
> > group were offered plants to care
> > for, whereas residents in the comparison group
> > were given plants that were watered by the staff.
> >
> > The data indicated that residents in the
> > responsibility-induced group became more
> > active and reported feeling happier than the
> > comparison group of residents, who were encouraged
> > to feel that the staff would care
> > for them and try to make them happy. Patients
> > in the responsibility-induced group
> > also showed a significant improvement in
> > alertness and increased behavioral involvement
> > in many different kinds of activities,
> > such as movie attendance, active socializing
> > with staff and friends, and contest participation.
> > In addition to collecting these multiple
> > questionnaire and behavioral measures at the
> > time, we have now been able to collect longterm
> > follow-up data on several variables, including
> > mortality.
> >
> > Mortality
> > The most striking data were obtained in
> > death rate differences between the two treatment
> > groups. Taking the 18 months prior to
> > the original intervention as an arbitrary comparison
> > period, we found that the average
> > death rate during that period was 25% for
> > the entire nursing home. In the subsequent
> > 18-month period following the intervention,
> > only 7 of the 47 subjects (15%) in the responsibility-
> > induced group died, whereas 13
> > of 44 subjects (30%) in the comparison
> > group had died. Using the arcsine transformation
> > for frequencies, this difference is
> > reliable (z = 3.14, p < .01).
> >
> > Because these results were so startling,
> > we assessed other factors that might have
> > accounted for the differences. Unfortunately,
> > we simply cannot know everything about the
> > equivalency of these subjects prior to the
> > intervention. We do know that those who
> > died did not differ reliably in the length of
> > time that they had been institutionalized
> > or in their overall health status when the
> > study began. These means are presented in
> > Table 4, which also presents the nurses' evaluations
> > prior to the intervention. From these
> > ratings it is clear that the nurses had given
> > lower evaluations prior to the intervention to
> > those patients who subsequently died than to
> > those who were still living, F ( l , 48) = 7.73,
> > p < .01. The interaction between treatment
> > group and the life-death variable was not
> > significant, however.
>
> Perhaps a few jewels buried in here.
>
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life/#7
>
> Taste below.
>
> Bill
>
> ........................................................
>
> ³Living organisms are autopoietic systems: self-constructing,
> self-maintaining, energy-transducing autocatalytic entities² in which
> information needed to construct the next generation of organisms is
> stabilized in nucleic acids that replicate within the context of whole
> cells and work with other developmental resources during the life-cycles
> of organisms, but they are also ³systems capable of evolving by
> variation and natural selection: self-reproducing entities, whose forms
> and functions are adapted to their environment and reflect the
> composition and history of an ecosystem² (Harold 2001, 232)
>
> It will be argued below that living systems may be defined as open
> systems maintained in steady-states, far-from-equilibrium, due to
> matter-energy flows in which informed (genetically) autocatalytic cycles
> extract energy, build complex internal structures, allowing growth even
> as they create greater entropy in their environments.
Uh, yeah, I was just going to make that point ;O)
You're either busy being born, or busy dying as the bard said.
Or to paraphrase the I Ching,"It furthers one to have a place, where one
wants to go."
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines
Posted by David Hare-Scott on January 31, 2010, 3:11 pm
Wildbilly wrote:
> Other tasks could have replaced caring for plants, but this study
> shows that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing
> home residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and,
> extend their lives.
Possibly control and responsibility are the factors but I think anything
that keeps the residents active physically, mentally and socially would do
the same. In old age inactivity and passivity are the killers. People who
give up on life have less quality and quantity.
David
Posted by Wildbilly on January 31, 2010, 5:28 pm
> Wildbilly wrote:
> > Other tasks could have replaced caring for plants, but this study
> > shows that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing
> > home residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and,
> > extend their lives.
>
>
> Possibly control and responsibility are the factors but I think anything
> that keeps the residents active physically, mentally and socially would do
> the same. In old age inactivity and passivity are the killers. People who
> give up on life have less quality and quantity.
>
> David
I think you are right, David, being engaged, and participating seems to
be the key. That's why I hope that when I get too old and silly, someone
will give me a plant to care for.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines
> that control and responsibility, extended the lives of nursing home
> residents and, tended to improve their level of functioning and, extend
> their lives.
>
> Conversely, having no control (such as voting for change and, get Bush
> III) should reduce their level of functioning and, shorten their lives.
>
> http://capital2.capital.edu/faculty/jfournie/documents/Rodin_Judith.pdf
>
> Long-Term Effects of a Control-Relevant Intervention With
> the Institutionalized Aged
>
> In a field study (Langer & Rodin, 1976),
> we assessed the effects of an intervention designed
> to encourage elderly nursing home
> residents to make a greater number of choices
> and to feel more control and responsibility
> for day-to-day events. The study was intended
> to determine whether the decline in
> health, alertness, and activity that generally
> occurs in the aged in nursing home settings
> could be slowed or reversed by choice and
> control manipulations that have been shown
> to have beneficial effects in other contexts
>
> The hospital administrator gave a talk to
> residents in the experimental group emphasizing
> their responsibility for themselves,
> whereas the communication given to a second,
> comparison group stressed the staff's
> responsibility for them as patients. To bolster
> the communication, residents in the experimental
> group were offered plants to care
> for, whereas residents in the comparison group
> were given plants that were watered by the staff.
>
> The data indicated that residents in the
> responsibility-induced group became more
> active and reported feeling happier than the
> comparison group of residents, who were encouraged
> to feel that the staff would care
> for them and try to make them happy. Patients
> in the responsibility-induced group
> also showed a significant improvement in
> alertness and increased behavioral involvement
> in many different kinds of activities,
> such as movie attendance, active socializing
> with staff and friends, and contest participation.
> In addition to collecting these multiple
> questionnaire and behavioral measures at the
> time, we have now been able to collect longterm
> follow-up data on several variables, including
> mortality.
>
> Mortality
> The most striking data were obtained in
> death rate differences between the two treatment
> groups. Taking the 18 months prior to
> the original intervention as an arbitrary comparison
> period, we found that the average
> death rate during that period was 25% for
> the entire nursing home. In the subsequent
> 18-month period following the intervention,
> only 7 of the 47 subjects (15%) in the responsibility-
> induced group died, whereas 13
> of 44 subjects (30%) in the comparison
> group had died. Using the arcsine transformation
> for frequencies, this difference is
> reliable (z = 3.14, p < .01).
>
> Because these results were so startling,
> we assessed other factors that might have
> accounted for the differences. Unfortunately,
> we simply cannot know everything about the
> equivalency of these subjects prior to the
> intervention. We do know that those who
> died did not differ reliably in the length of
> time that they had been institutionalized
> or in their overall health status when the
> study began. These means are presented in
> Table 4, which also presents the nurses' evaluations
> prior to the intervention. From these
> ratings it is clear that the nurses had given
> lower evaluations prior to the intervention to
> those patients who subsequently died than to
> those who were still living, F ( l , 48) = 7.73,
> p < .01. The interaction between treatment
> group and the life-death variable was not
> significant, however.