Site review (pruning)

 Sorry for the bother.

I have put together a website on pruning.  before I link it to the
dictionary I was hoping someone could review this for me.  I am still
working on the section on branches and cracks.  I will be getting some
pictures of cracks to add.  I would really appreciate this.  Any feed back
is welcome.

the web can be found at:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/tree_pruning/index.html

Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Arborist
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and  www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

 symplastless wrote:

Overall, the page is somewhat attractive.  It would be more so if a
consistent font size were used.

Proofread your text.  For example, you have a link with the text "Trees
(Generating Verses Regenerating Systems)".  I think you mean "versus",
not "verses".

The page took a while to load.  Like almost half the Internet users in
the U.S. (per a study by the Government Accountability Office), I use a
dial-up modem.  I suggest you create a separate page for each major
topic.  Then, the main page should have a link to each of those pages
with a BRIEF paragraph about the topic.

The page has 12 HTML errors according to <http://validator.w3.org/> .  To
reach the broadest audience, it should comply with the W3C specifications.

--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Natural foods can be harmful:  Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.

 David

How can I find out about the link problem?

John

 The only link problem I cited was the text for the link ("versus", not
"verses"), not the link itself.

symplastless wrote:

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Natural foods can be harmful:  Look at all the
people who die of natural causes.

 Thanks David I fixed that.  Thank you for your time.

John