Posted by Snit on November 26, 2010, 7:50 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post 4cf05219@news.x-privat.org on
11/26/10 5:34 PM:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> I have looked back and it sounds as though Steve is not really sure
>>> what he wants or needs at this time.
>>
>>
>> As I said in the very first post, despite the non-contiguous menu
>> issue, "I have the uploader module working the way I want". I "want"
>> to avoid BLOBs altogether because, as I also said in the first post,
>> I have an uploader "that currently doesn't store as BLOBs".
>>
>>> And, no, that is *not* a put down
>>
>> No worries, I realize your statements are based on your inability to
>> comprehend what you read and things that are obvious to any idiot ;)
>>
>>> ... it means he is learning.
>>
>> What tipped you off? Was it that I asked for the help of
>> "knowledgeable professionals"? LOL!
>>
>> But this all begs the question: Why are you here? Being that you
>> decided to chime in with professionals I'll point out something any
>> professional "teacher" (what you claim to be) would immediately
>> recognize as being the reality about a topic with this much depth...
>> and it's a sentiment that is likely shared by most (if not all) who
>> engage in it:
>>
>> I don't believe I know of anyone who knows anyone who is using
>> languages and/or databases to get computers to do what they want to
>> that *isn't* learning.
>>
>>> Does look like he needs to understand the task a bit better
>>> before he starts looking to see how to accomplish it.
>>
>>
>> Actually... I know "how to accomplish it" (both ways), but this is a
>> matter of whether it's logical and prudent to do it one way over
>> another for my application.
>>
>> Hint: Read the first question I asked in this thread. You'll notice it
>> was not about "how to accomplish" the storing of files, which is all
>> the professionals and I are talking about here.
>>
>>
>> BTW... your "*not* a put down" wasn't too effective IMO ;)
Steve: You are very, very touchy. There was no insult implied or stated.
By me. You, as is your norm, spew insults by habit.
> LOL!
Steve: as you are learning this you are seeing the "task" in a very narrow
sense. As you become more experienced you will start to see the bigger
picture... you will see the "task" as being more than just uploading but the
*reason* for uploading, what you plan to do with the data, who will need to
edit things, how the data will be presented, etc. For example, if you just
need someone to be able to add media to some front end, then it might work
fine to have an uploader and a simple web-app front end where they can alter
an HTML table or XML file with a relatively friendly front end. No need for
an SQL database of any sort nor any even moderately complex programming. Or
maybe you have greater needs... but at this point in your learning that
clearly is overwhelming to you.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Posted by High Plains Thumper on November 26, 2010, 8:01 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish wrote:
> LOL!
Hello, Snit. *Plinque*
--
HPT
Posted by Steve Carroll on November 26, 2010, 8:33 pm
> Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post 4cf05...@news.x-privat.org on
> 11/26/10 5:34 PM:
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> I have looked back and it sounds as though Steve is not really sure
> >>> what he wants or needs at this time.
> >> As I said in the very first post, despite the non-contiguous menu
> >> issue, "I have the uploader module working the way I want". I "want"
> >> to avoid BLOBs altogether because, as I also said in the first post,
> >> I have an uploader "that currently doesn't store as BLOBs".
> >>> And, no, that is *not* a put down
> >> No worries, I realize your statements are based on your inability to
> >> comprehend what you read and things that are obvious to any idiot ;)
> >>> ... it means he is learning.
> >> What tipped you off? Was it that I asked for the help of
> >> "knowledgeable professionals"? LOL!
> >> But this all begs the question: Why are you here? Being that you
> >> decided to chime in with professionals I'll point out something any
> >> professional "teacher" (what you claim to be) would immediately
> >> recognize as being the reality about a topic with this much depth...
> >> and it's a sentiment that is likely shared by most (if not all) who
> >> engage in it:
> >> I don't believe I know of anyone who knows anyone who is using
> >> languages and/or databases to get computers to do what they want to
> >> that *isn't* learning.
> >>> Does look like he needs to understand the task a bit better
> >>> before he starts looking to see how to accomplish it.
> >> Actually... I know "how to accomplish it" (both ways), but this is a
> >> matter of whether it's logical and prudent to do it one way over
> >> another for my application.
> >> Hint: Read the first question I asked in this thread. You'll notice it
> >> was not about "how to accomplish" the storing of files, which is all
> >> the professionals and I are talking about here.
> >> BTW... your "*not* a put down" wasn't too effective IMO ;)
> Steve: You are very
... right. Thank you, Snit.
(snip Snit's rant where he pretends I didn't already talk about the
stuff he's trying to "teach" me... on a topic he knows next to nothing
about, as also proven by the crap I'm snipping).
Posted by Snit on November 26, 2010, 9:33 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post 4cf06ca3@news.x-privat.org on
11/26/10 7:27 PM:
...
>>>>> BTW... your "*not* a put down" wasn't too effective IMO ;)
>>>
>>> Steve: You are very, very touchy. There was no insult implied or stated.
>>> By me. You, as is your norm, spew insults by habit.
>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>>
>>> Steve: as you are learning this you are seeing the "task" in a very narrow
>>> sense. As you become more experienced you will start to see the bigger
>>> picture... you will see the "task" as being more than just uploading but the
>>> *reason* for uploading, what you plan to do with the data, who will need to
>>> edit things, how the data will be presented, etc. For example, if you just
>>> need someone to be able to add media to some front end, then it might work
>>> fine to have an uploader and a simple web-app front end where they can alter
>>> an HTML table or XML file with a relatively friendly front end. No need for
>>> an SQL database of any sort nor any even moderately complex programming. Or
>>> maybe you have greater needs... but at this point in your learning that
>>> clearly is overwhelming to you.
And all you can do is snip and spew your BS, below. It is not like you are
hiding the fact you know I am right.
Come on, Steve, there is no shame in learning. It is good you are learning
and it is good you are asking questions. Nobody is putting you down for
this. Relax a little and let go of your obvious anger.
>> ... right. Thank you, Snit.
>>
>> (snip Snit's rant where he pretends I didn't already talk about the
>> stuff he's trying to "teach" me... on a topic he knows next to nothing
>> about, as also proven by the crap I'm snipping).
>
> LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Posted by Steve Carroll on November 26, 2010, 10:37 pm
(snip)
> >>> Steve: You are very
... right. Thank you, Snit.
(snip Snit's rant where he pretends I didn't already talk about the
stuff he's trying to "teach" me... on a topic he knows next to
nothing
about, as also proven by the crap I'm snipping).
> And all you can do is snip
Who shouldn't snip your BS? I think everyone should every time they
see it. You'd soon tire of posting it and you'd eventually be a better
person for it. You should look upon my snipping as a "way" to help you
mature to the point where you no longer feel the need to write drivel
that deserves to be snipped.
> Come on, Steve, there is no shame in learning.
Why are you talking about "shame in learning"? As you claim to be a
"teacher" maybe you are just projecting here and you feel a sense of
shame about your inability to "teach".
XML site map
>>
>>> I have looked back and it sounds as though Steve is not really sure
>>> what he wants or needs at this time.
>>
>>
>> As I said in the very first post, despite the non-contiguous menu
>> issue, "I have the uploader module working the way I want". I "want"
>> to avoid BLOBs altogether because, as I also said in the first post,
>> I have an uploader "that currently doesn't store as BLOBs".
>>
>>> And, no, that is *not* a put down
>>
>> No worries, I realize your statements are based on your inability to
>> comprehend what you read and things that are obvious to any idiot ;)
>>
>>> ... it means he is learning.
>>
>> What tipped you off? Was it that I asked for the help of
>> "knowledgeable professionals"? LOL!
>>
>> But this all begs the question: Why are you here? Being that you
>> decided to chime in with professionals I'll point out something any
>> professional "teacher" (what you claim to be) would immediately
>> recognize as being the reality about a topic with this much depth...
>> and it's a sentiment that is likely shared by most (if not all) who
>> engage in it:
>>
>> I don't believe I know of anyone who knows anyone who is using
>> languages and/or databases to get computers to do what they want to
>> that *isn't* learning.
>>
>>> Does look like he needs to understand the task a bit better
>>> before he starts looking to see how to accomplish it.
>>
>>
>> Actually... I know "how to accomplish it" (both ways), but this is a
>> matter of whether it's logical and prudent to do it one way over
>> another for my application.
>>
>> Hint: Read the first question I asked in this thread. You'll notice it
>> was not about "how to accomplish" the storing of files, which is all
>> the professionals and I are talking about here.
>>
>>
>> BTW... your "*not* a put down" wasn't too effective IMO ;)