Posted by Hitman Hero on October 20, 2010, 12:52 pm
Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -hh stated:
>>
>>>>> Remember that one, Snit? Where people were confronting you on
>>>>> providing false info when you registered your domain name and you
>>>>> tried to pretend that you had a special contract with GoDaddy? You
>>>>> said:
>>
>>>>> "Not everyone is "stuck" with the standard agreements."
>>
>>>>> Then your reg info quickly changed and I pointed it out and other
>>>>> posters were laughing at your lie and subsequent (feeble) attempt
>>>>> at a coverup. Oh what fun we had;)
>>
>>>> Regardless of what name he posts under, Michael Glasser simply lies
>>>> too frequently to take any of his claims of 'proof' as credible.
>>>> Time to put the little troll back into the proverbial killfile.
>>
>>> LOL! I rubbed your nose in your lack of ability to use Google *even
>>> with help* and your inability to face simple facts... and now you
>>> bad mouth me and are going to run away acting like it is because of
>>> something immoral about *me*.
>>
>> Yet another lie from Michael Glasser.
>>
>> Sounds like its time to suggest that someone might make a phone call
>> to get him to stop lying.
> Unfortunately, this probably won't work. I think they leave the
> computer in his 'dorm room' (that's what they tell him it is) so that
> he doesn't hurt the other patien... uh... students;)
>>> And I will sit here laughing at you. Have a good day.
>>
>> Oh, I will.
>>
>> (-: wait! Is that the phone ringing? :-)
>>
>> -hh
LOL!
Posted by Hitman Hero on October 20, 2010, 12:52 pm
Snit wrote:
> -hh stated in post
> bbff6f9c-c57d-40e7-a2a0-d0b92eb75c00@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com on
> 10/20/10 3:02 AM:
>>>
>>> Google found THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT posts from
>>> Author "Snit" that mentioned both Sandman and CSS.
>>>
>>> But your search does not include the "author" parameter.
>>
>> Here is the first search URL, post-TinyURL, unparsed:
>>
>> <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=css
>> +sandman&enc_author=N29CWRwAAAB8IuxuAkSWsR99E6JXvMAQD-cD5ZFxuGaiAJ5DF-
>> b-xw&qt_p=Search+author%27s+posts>
>>
>> Parsed, the last part says:
>>
>> "p=Search+author%27s+posts"
>>
>>
>> Golly ... there's that word "author" ... and what do you think that
>> "Search Author's Posts" actually does within Google?
>>
>>
>> And just before that, it lists:
>>
>> "enc_author=N29CWRwAAAB8IuxuAkSWsR99E6JXvMAQD-cD5ZFxuGaiAJ5DF-b-xw&qt"
>>
>>
>> Golly ... that looks like this part is identifying a specific author,
>> somehow ... what does it actually does within Google?
>>
>> Gee ... perhaps Google has more than just one authorship search
>> option?
>>
>>
>> Just because you personally don't understand how something works
>> doesn't mean that it doesn't work.
>>
>>
>>
>> -hh
> As noted, you have no idea what you are doing. Here, from Google:
> <http://www.googleguide.com/advanced_operators.html#author>
> -----
> author:
> If you include author: in your query, Google will
> restrict your Google Groups results to include newsgroup
> articles by the author you specify. The author can be a
> full or partial name or email address. For example, [
> children author:john author:doe ] or [ children
> author:doe@someaddress.com ] return articles that
> contain the word ³children² written by John Doe or
> doe@someaddress.com.
> -----
> And to show your search failing and, of course, mine working just
> fine:
> <http://goo.gl/pBge>
> Just because you think you know how something works does not mean you
> do. Notice how your search fails and mine, of course, works just fine.
> And please remember, it is not as though you were not told how to do
> it correctly. Also remember how you have been running from answering
> simple questions such as:
> -----
> Why do you think Sandman lied about his CSS if does not think
> it is a big deal?
> -----
> Out of curiosity, what comment of mine do you think is a lie?
> ------
> Neither one can you answer... the second being a response to your
> direct - and false - accusation. And you refuse to comment on
> Sandman's many clearly dishonest pages on his site placed there just
> to troll me.
> And because of this you make *threats* against me. Threats.
> What a miserable sense of morality you have!
LOL!
Posted by Hitman Hero on October 20, 2010, 12:53 pm
Snit wrote:
> -hh stated in post
> 5b8286b7-fc4b-4b4d-a8eb-0a6fac126216@v20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com on
> 10/19/10 7:45 PM:
> ...
>>>> Regardless of what name he posts under, Michael Glasser simply lies
>>>> too frequently to take any of his claims of 'proof' as credible.
>>>> Time to put the little troll back into the proverbial killfile.
>>>
>>> LOL! I rubbed your nose in your lack of ability to use Google
>>> *even with help* and your inability to face simple facts... and now
>>> you bad mouth me and are going to run away acting like it is
>>> because of something immoral about *me*.
>>>
>>> Too funny. Here is some of what got you to run away in fear...
>>> like a scared little bunny:
>>>
>>> Your inability to use Google:
>>> -----
>>> Your searches:
>>> <http://tinyurl.com/snit-CSS-sandman>
>>> <http://tinyurl.com/sandman-CSS-snit>
>>>
>>> The better searches:
>>> <http://goo.gl/eOhI>
>>> <http://goo.gl/1peB>
>>> -----
> No comment from you. You could not use Google... as shown, above.
> Remember, you claimed:
> Google found THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT posts from
> Author "Snit" that mentioned both Sandman and CSS.
> But your search does not include the "author" parameter. Even after
> you were told that you showed no understanding. You simply did not
> know how to use Google to do the search you wanted.
>>> Your inability to answer simple questions:
>>> -----
>>> Why do you think Sandman lied about his CSS if does not think
>>> it is a big deal?
>>> -----
> And you have no answer to that question.
>>> Your running from Sandman's obsession with lying about me:
>>> ------
>>> 1 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
>>> 2 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
>>> 3 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
>>> 4 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
>>> 5 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
>>> 6 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
>>> ------
>>>
>>> Your repeating of Sandman's debunked claims, such as this one:
>>> <http://goo.gl/drHK>
> And you make no comment about Sandman's obsession. You just cannot
> deal with the idea that, contrary to your obvious view, he is clearly
> not some poor victim here... he repeatedly lies about me and even has
> multiple web pages set up for *no* other reason than to bad mouth me
> and tell lies.
>>> On and on. You made accusations against me and I was able to turn
>>> things around on you and show how you were, well, rather clueless
>>> and clearly dishonest. Poor -hh... no run along and hide under
>>> your rock. Stay in the shadows where the light of the sun
>>> (honesty) will not bother you.
>>
>> Yet another lie from Michael Glasser.
>>
>> Sounds like its time to suggest that someone might make a phone call
>> to get him to stop lying.
>>
>>
>>> And I will sit here laughing at you. Have a good day.
>>
>> Oh, I will.
>>
>> (-: wait! Is that the phone ringing? :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> -hh
> Out of curiosity, what comment of mine do you think is a lie? Note,
> above, I returned what you were so ashamed of you snipped. Face it:
> you made a complete fool of yourself and the only way you know to
> handle it is to lash out with accusations and even threats. I feel
> bad for you - you are clearly filled with self-loathing.
LOL!
XML site map
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -hh stated:
>>
>>>>> Remember that one, Snit? Where people were confronting you on
>>>>> providing false info when you registered your domain name and you
>>>>> tried to pretend that you had a special contract with GoDaddy? You
>>>>> said:
>>
>>>>> "Not everyone is "stuck" with the standard agreements."
>>
>>>>> Then your reg info quickly changed and I pointed it out and other
>>>>> posters were laughing at your lie and subsequent (feeble) attempt
>>>>> at a coverup. Oh what fun we had;)
>>
>>>> Regardless of what name he posts under, Michael Glasser simply lies
>>>> too frequently to take any of his claims of 'proof' as credible.
>>>> Time to put the little troll back into the proverbial killfile.
>>
>>> LOL! I rubbed your nose in your lack of ability to use Google *even
>>> with help* and your inability to face simple facts... and now you
>>> bad mouth me and are going to run away acting like it is because of
>>> something immoral about *me*.
>>
>> Yet another lie from Michael Glasser.
>>
>> Sounds like its time to suggest that someone might make a phone call
>> to get him to stop lying.
> Unfortunately, this probably won't work. I think they leave the
> computer in his 'dorm room' (that's what they tell him it is) so that
> he doesn't hurt the other patien... uh... students;)
>>> And I will sit here laughing at you. Have a good day.
>>
>> Oh, I will.
>>
>> (-: wait! Is that the phone ringing? :-)
>>
>> -hh
LOL!