Posted by Bill who putters on July 8, 2009, 9:52 am
NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.
<http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>
Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
USA.
Bill
--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
Posted by Cheryl Isaak on July 9, 2009, 7:28 am
On 7/8/09 9:52 AM, in article
b2forewagner-A9A14B.09520908072009@news.supernews.com, "Bill who putters"
> NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.
>
> <http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>
>
>
> Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
> USA.
>
> Bill
When we were in Yosemite 20+ years ago, the rangers said the only way for
the sequoia cones to release their seed was to be burned.
C
Posted by Dioclese on July 10, 2009, 9:07 am
> NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.
> <http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>
> Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
> USA.
> Bill
> --
> Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
I'm of the opinion that where people build homes, they need to allow for
natural burning and consequential wind when maintaining a fire break as
well. A small footprint of land for this is not feasible, the owner has to
have a large enough plot to do this. Hillside acreage, its even more
important. And, I'm of the opinion its the homeowner's responsibility to
maintain such a firebreak, not the local or state government in the case of
a fire approaching said property.
--
Dave
>
> <http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>
>
>
> Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
> USA.
>
> Bill