Posted by brooklyn1 on March 6, 2010, 8:45 pm
White_Noise_1@webtv.net (EVP MAN) contains these words:
> Does anyone think that planting crops by the phase of the moon really
> makes any difference at all?
Depends on the crop... when growing pot it matters. hehe
Posted by Bill who putters on March 7, 2010, 2:22 pm
White_Noise_1@webtv.net (EVP MAN) wrote:
> Does anyone think that planting crops by the phase of the moon really
> makes any difference at all? Myself, I'm kind of a sceptic about this
> whole moon phase thing.
>
> Rich
http://www.astrologie-info.com/mocal.cgi?language=eng&sidtrop=sid
Nay what effects can there be on us from a object so far away? OK
tides and menstrual periods but plant life come on.
Bill
--
Billl Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
<http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending>
Posted by David Hare-Scott on March 7, 2010, 4:38 pm
Bill who putters wrote:
> White_Noise_1@webtv.net (EVP MAN) wrote:
>> Does anyone think that planting crops by the phase of the moon really
>> makes any difference at all? Myself, I'm kind of a sceptic about
>> this whole moon phase thing.
>>
>> Rich
> http://www.astrologie-info.com/mocal.cgi?language=eng&sidtrop=sid
> Nay what effects can there be on us from a object so far away? OK
> tides and menstrual periods but plant life come on.
> Bill
Even the influence on MPs is very doubtful. The average MP interval (28
days) doesn't closely match the interval between full moons (29 1/2) and
individual women have cycles that are even less closely related. Why don't
other mammals have a cycle that matches the moon? Our closest relatives the
bonobos and chimpanzees have cycles of 35 and 45 days. If controlled by the
moon why are all women not synchronised? This connection is poor science
and much history and superstition, just like astrology.
David
Posted by Bill who putters on March 7, 2010, 5:04 pm
> Bill who putters wrote:
> > White_Noise_1@webtv.net (EVP MAN) wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone think that planting crops by the phase of the moon really
> >> makes any difference at all? Myself, I'm kind of a sceptic about
> >> this whole moon phase thing.
> >>
> >> Rich
> >
> > http://www.astrologie-info.com/mocal.cgi?language=eng&sidtrop=sid
> >
> > Nay what effects can there be on us from a object so far away? OK
> > tides and menstrual periods but plant life come on.
> >
> > Bill
>
> Even the influence on MPs is very doubtful. The average MP interval (28
> days) doesn't closely match the interval between full moons (29 1/2) and
> individual women have cycles that are even less closely related. Why don't
> other mammals have a cycle that matches the moon? Our closest relatives the
> bonobos and chimpanzees have cycles of 35 and 45 days. If controlled by the
> moon why are all women not synchronised? This connection is poor science
> and much history and superstition, just like astrology.
>
> David
Ah it is good when the bait is taken.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407788
--
Bill Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
<http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending>
Posted by David Hare-Scott on March 7, 2010, 11:25 pm
Bill who putters wrote:
>
>> Bill who putters wrote:
>>> White_Noise_1@webtv.net (EVP MAN) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone think that planting crops by the phase of the moon
>>>> really makes any difference at all? Myself, I'm kind of a
>>>> sceptic about this whole moon phase thing.
>>>>
>>>> Rich
>>>
>>> http://www.astrologie-info.com/mocal.cgi?language=eng&sidtrop=sid
>>>
>>> Nay what effects can there be on us from a object so far away? OK
>>> tides and menstrual periods but plant life come on.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
>> Even the influence on MPs is very doubtful. The average MP interval
>> (28 days) doesn't closely match the interval between full moons (29
>> 1/2) and individual women have cycles that are even less closely
>> related. Why don't other mammals have a cycle that matches the
>> moon? Our closest relatives the bonobos and chimpanzees have cycles
>> of 35 and 45 days. If controlled by the moon why are all women not
>> synchronised? This connection is poor science and much history and
>> superstition, just like astrology.
>>
>> David
>
> Ah it is good when the bait is taken.
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407788
Munchie munchie
D
XML site map
> makes any difference at all?