Posted by Ted Shoemaker on August 14, 2009, 2:51 pm
Can someone please help me figure out what a particular tree is?
It had acorns, a bit smaller than most oak acorns I've seen.
The leaves were not multi-lobed like oak leaves; in fact they looked a
lot like bay leaves. (They didn't smell like bay leaves, though.)
The bark was unremarkable, vaguely like a thousand varieties of
deciduous trees (elm, oak, maple, etc).
It was located in Tamarack, West Virginia.
Thank you!
Ted Shoemaker
Posted by Bill who putters on August 14, 2009, 3:08 pm
In article
> Can someone please help me figure out what a particular tree is?
>
> It had acorns, a bit smaller than most oak acorns I've seen.
>
> The leaves were not multi-lobed like oak leaves; in fact they looked a
> lot like bay leaves. (They didn't smell like bay leaves, though.)
>
> The bark was unremarkable, vaguely like a thousand varieties of
> deciduous trees (elm, oak, maple, etc).
>
> It was located in Tamarack, West Virginia.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ted Shoemaker
Ted any chance you can be a bit more vague? I'll place my hands on the
screen and see what appears. Leafs vs. Leaves matters btw.
<http://www.arcytech.org/java/population/oak_stories.html>
Bill
--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
Posted by Frank on August 14, 2009, 3:58 pm
Ted Shoemaker wrote:
> Can someone please help me figure out what a particular tree is?
>
> It had acorns, a bit smaller than most oak acorns I've seen.
>
> The leaves were not multi-lobed like oak leaves; in fact they looked a
> lot like bay leaves. (They didn't smell like bay leaves, though.)
>
> The bark was unremarkable, vaguely like a thousand varieties of
> deciduous trees (elm, oak, maple, etc).
>
> It was located in Tamarack, West Virginia.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ted Shoemaker
I'd google "oak leaves" and look in the image category. There are
different kinds. Maybe you'll find yours.
Posted by Stewart Robert Hinsley on August 14, 2009, 4:36 pm
In message
>Can someone please help me figure out what a particular tree is?
>It had acorns, a bit smaller than most oak acorns I've seen.
>The leaves were not multi-lobed like oak leaves; in fact they looked a
>lot like bay leaves. (They didn't smell like bay leaves, though.)
If you were in Europe I'd suggest something like Holm Oak (Quercus
ilex). In America, perhaps one of the Live Oaks.
>The bark was unremarkable, vaguely like a thousand varieties of
>deciduous trees (elm, oak, maple, etc).
>It was located in Tamarack, West Virginia.
>Thank you!
>Ted Shoemaker
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
Posted by Balvenieman on August 15, 2009, 5:40 pm
>In America, perhaps one of the Live Oaks
From the sketchy description, I'd guess a "laurel" oak (Quercus
hemisphaerica) or "swamp laurel" oak (Quercus laurifolia). The two
species are basically indistinguishable to a casual observer. The leaves
of both more closely resemble laurel leaves than do those of "live" oak
(Quercus virginiana): They are much thinner and flatter and, as a rule,
less deeply geen-colored. However, both are fairly uncommon, though not
unseen, in the US state of West Virginia.
http://www.cnr.vt.edu/DENDRO/DENDROLOGY/SYLLABUS/factsheet.cfm?ID50
http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/4h/Laurel_oak/laureoak.htm
--
Running on single malt in U.S.A.
Peninsular Florida,
USDA zone 9b
>
> It had acorns, a bit smaller than most oak acorns I've seen.
>
> The leaves were not multi-lobed like oak leaves; in fact they looked a
> lot like bay leaves. (They didn't smell like bay leaves, though.)
>
> The bark was unremarkable, vaguely like a thousand varieties of
> deciduous trees (elm, oak, maple, etc).
>
> It was located in Tamarack, West Virginia.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ted Shoemaker