http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2009/12/15/climate-change-is-natural-and-heres-proof/
> We may have polluted the planet with
>> things that can cause us harm, but as far us having anything to do
>> with climate or weather change there is not one bit of factual evidence.
> What is weather change?
A giant scam.
>> The Earth has been warming since the ice age, and it's the least of
>> our problems.
> Show me the evidence.
Is the earth frozen over, if not it must of warmed
aluckyguess wrote:
http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2009/12/15/climate-change-is-natural-and-heres-proof/
>>
>> We may have polluted the planet with
>>> things that can cause us harm, but as far us having anything to do
>>> with climate or weather change there is not one bit of factual
>>> evidence.
>>
>> What is weather change?
> A giant scam.
>>
>>> The Earth has been warming since the ice age, and it's the least of
>>> our problems.
>>
>> Show me the evidence.
> Is the earth frozen over, if not it must of warmed
OK you are a joker. You had me going for a while
David
He cherry picked temperatures (he didn't mention the temperatures at the
North and South Poles), and he tossed out a few invectives, but he never
said anything. He offered no proof of anything. It was all sneering, and
no content. You would have thought that he was from one of our political
parties, either a Plutocrat or a Kleptocrat (it's hard to tell them
apart). They should have little tags on them saying, "SOLD".
Curing global warming will hurt corporations' "bottom line", otherwise,
we wouldn't be having this conversation. They would rather see a rise in
next quarter's earning, than worry about their own grandchildren, much
less ours.
Acid rain wasn't caused by humans.
The "Ozone Hole" wasn't caused by humans.
Smog isn't caused by humans.
Global warming isn't caused by humans.
What do the above four sentences have in common?
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines
XML site map
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> On 1/21/2010 11:04 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
>>>>> aluckyguess wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not a voter for your congress but I would hope that my elected
>>>>> representatives were more perceptive and informed than the speaker
>>>>> in this clip. Being unable to distinguish between climate and
>>>>> weather does not fill me with confidence that the speaker
>>>>> understands anything about climate change.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> That's the knee jerk argument.
>>>
>>> I don 't understand that comment. What is knee-jerk about saying a
>>> person who doesn't understand the difference between weather and
>>> climate is ignorant? What is knee-jerk about wanting my
>>> representatives to be perceptive and informed?
>>>
>>>> My skepticism comes in as to how much
>>>> weather change is man made vs just what mother nature does.
>>>
>>> Weather does change all the time. We need to consider if the earth's
>>> climate is changing and if so why. These are two different issues.
>>>
>>> We hear
>>>> other planets in our solar system are also warming and I don't think
>>>> anybody there are driving SUV's.
>>>
>>> Where did you hear that? Assuming for moment that the climate was
>>> changing on other planets from natural causes why would that show
>>> that climate is not changing on earth from human causes?
>>>
>>> We know that the earth's climate has changed in the past naturally
>>> and it may well do so again. That by itself says nothing about
>>> whether it *is* doing so naturally this time. This question has
>>> been much studied and there is considerable evidence available that
>>> points to the cause this time being human activity.
>>>
>> It does not, there is nowhere that proves it has anything to do with
>> human activity.
>> It actually proves otherwise.
> OK show me such proof.