Thought you ought to know... - Page 2

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
Posted by PC on February 7, 2010, 6:30 pm
 
please rate
this thread


On 8/02/2010 9:45 AM, David Hare-Scott wrote:

Show me?
Now it seems I've gone up in the world. Thank you for your apparent
attempt at explaining what I do. I didnt realise. What a relief...
Re: Weather and climate>>> They are both interelated, and the argument
is over you said... I use the interchangeble. You like to jump in it to
ridicule. When people loose they often resort to this method. I dont
think youre very nice!

Just because you only know how to use one computer, I use a few...As i
explained before, otherwise I would deny the fact.

You who doesnt WISH to understand why scientists  need to explain, also
appear to haul in a few names but you dont tell....

There is NO need for carbon credits as CO2 effects stop being effective
and cannot increase its effects after its reached a certain level. What
part of that dont you understand?
What part cant you understand? Are you all that bright?

O boy, if you could only read and understand.
Try again... Youve failed miserably in the past.
BTW this garden.aud is part of the intranet, and as such is seen over
quite a large network ALL over the world....
I dont see to many disagreeing besides self interested people.
Whereas I have no pecuniary interest...



climate models with respect to CO2 is the forcing parameter.

There is no actual physical rational for the forcing parameter, because
it was simply

contrived from the assumption that observed warming of 0.6°C was due
entirely to a 100ppmv

increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration.

There was never any verification of this parameter either by theory or
observation.

There is no justification for this parameter based on the physical
properties of CO2,

because the molecular configuration of the CO2 molecule precludes any
significant effect

from CO2 beyond a concentration of 300ppmv, and the current
concentration is 386ppmv.

triple or otherwise increase.

carbon level.



Posted by Terryc on February 9, 2010, 9:49 pm
 

PC wrote:


interrelated =/= interchangeable.
And no, there is a relationship, but it isn't reversible.

Posted by Dan on February 8, 2010, 6:40 am
 



It does seem weird, but colder conditions are just as normal as hotter
conditions as a result of global warming. It is the heat that drives the
weather systems. Thus extra heat means extra driving force. Hence all
weather events become more extreme. That includes cold spells.
We just have to learn to survive it.
Cheers,
Dan



Posted by atec 77 on February 8, 2010, 7:44 am
 

  Dan wrote:

I guess rationalising a natural happening floats your boat , I remember
in the 70's we used to get huge rainfall here in Brizvegas just like the
last few days , maybe things are returning to normal

Posted by Terryc on February 9, 2010, 9:54 pm
 

atec 77 wrote:


Funny you should say that, buy my back door frame adjusted itself
overnight and now, after taking out the hinge packing, it is closable
and lockable just like when it was installed.

We are on piers on clay, not a slab, so this means the recent heavy
rains have raised the water content of the claybased soil under my house.

To me, flooding on the NSW north coas was just a regular event.