Posted by Polly the Parrot on November 8, 2008, 11:29 am
> There are pictures at
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/sizes/o/
Require a sign in!
Posted by LindaB on November 8, 2008, 1:19 pm
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/sizes/o/
> requires a sign-in.
My apologies.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/
should not. It is just not as large a photo, but should do the trick.
Linda
Posted by obliger on November 8, 2008, 1:49 pm
wrote:
>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/sizes/o/
>> requires a sign-in.
>My apologies.
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/
>should not. It is just not as large a photo, but should do the trick.
>Linda
Linda
There is certainly a major difference, but I'm not sure how one can
judge which will turn out to be the better plant in the end.
Posted by Polly the Parrot on November 9, 2008, 6:06 pm
> My apologies.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/
>
> should not. It is just not as large a photo, but should do the trick.
Thanks. Interesting.
Posted by =?iso-8859-1?b?SmXfdXM=?= on November 8, 2008, 3:03 pm
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:29:14 +1100, Polly the Parrot wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> There are pictures at
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/sizes/o/
>
>
> Require a sign in!
Bloody Yahoo strikes again :(
XML site map
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/96156254@N00/3012499548/sizes/o/