Re: Found a garden blog

 

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:08:51 +1100, LindaB wrote:



And now I am accusing you of being a lying spammer.

 



Yep - didn't think you would like the truth. You are happy to spray it
around out there. And remember you started it.

Go to

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/search?path=AUS-NSW-Hunter-Valley

Search by call[at]hunterlink.net.au in the "from" field

It leads you to

http://home.pacific.net.au/~tandd/about.html

That is spam. You are trawling for people to go to your website, where
you offer services in return for payment. And it is not just once. It
is an ongoing practice.

Pointing people once to a garden site, that is not mine, that is
not-for-profit, on a garden news group, when there is no profit or
advantage to me, is not.

Sorry everyone for the continuation - no matter *what* this troll
comes back with, I will not be answering it. I have better places to
be, like out in the garden. Everything out there is growing
beautifully.

Linda
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com  **

 

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:29:38 +1100, LindaB wrote:



Not me and thus not my website.
so you're not lying, just made a mistake.

Look, if you think you've found a fine blogsplat site, fine. Stand by
your post. Stop acting like a spammer and defending it, unless you wantto
cough up that it is yours or you have an interest in it. sock puppetting
== spamming.

 
I haven't seen anything Linda said that I thought was a lie, but I have
wondered why you went off about blogs being about spam (or perhaps a source
of spam).  I didn't understand what you were on about at all.

 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:33:32 +1100, FarmI wrote:


Her material in the post before, but as she explained, simply
confusion of different people, not that I post on genealogical lists with
this name.

So Far, so good, we have lttle blogsplat spam here, but some usenet and
lists get 99% mentons of bugsplat as spam. There must be some sort of
renuertion from viewers or something.