Posted by Jonno on January 24, 2010, 8:15 am
No it inst me, though this is, , and I certainly dont smoke.
That for idiots. I try to look after my health.
The world does appear to reflect what this guys saying.
Haven't you read the Da Vinci Code? See Link >>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Da_Vinci_Code_%28film%29
To be sure, I have a great CD on radical thoughts, but I look beyond those.
Being government employed, I reckon you cant see this!
I reckon people on a whole are OK.
You appear to be little bit on the wobbly side of sane.
Only your ideas count?
I am still on the level, but feel degraded due to your superior skills
at ridiculing what most notmal people see.
Even Abbott is using climate change to political advantage. He's wrong too!
Be very careful on your interpretations. You may just loosen the screws
that ruin the Planet.
On 24/01/2010 11:15 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
> Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ wrote:
>> Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of
>> money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the
>> production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so,
>> say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and
>> Communism...
> Jonno is that you again? What have you been smoking this time?
> David
--
Posted by Jonno on January 24, 2010, 8:18 am
No it isn't me, though this is, , and I certainly don't smoke.
That for idiots. I try to look after my health.
The world does appear to reflect what this guys saying.
Haven't you read the Da Vinci Code? See Link >>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Da_Vinci_Code_%28film%29
To be sure, I have a great CD on radical thoughts, but I look beyond those.
Being government employed, I reckon you cant see this!
I reckon people on a whole are OK.
You appear to be little bit on the wobbly side of sane.
Only your ideas count?
I am still on the level, but feel degraded due to your superior skills
at ridiculing what most normal people see.
Even Abbott is using climate change to political advantage. He's wrong
too! Or putting his own interpretation on it for political advantage.
Be very careful on your interpretations of things. You may just loosen
the screws that ruin the Planet.
Try a little bit of loctite.
On 24/01/2010 11:15 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
> Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ wrote:
>> Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of
>> money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the
>> production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so,
>> say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and
>> Communism...
> Jonno is that you again? What have you been smoking this time?
> David
--
Posted by Jonno on January 24, 2010, 8:09 pm
*Not being a lover of banks, I see some sympathy with the writings of
this chap.
There appears to be some smoke and mirrors with banks doesn't there?
I wish I could join the club!
But no, I didnt write this.
As I wrote previously, being an ass, you assume too mucn and make an ass
out of you and me!
You may want to read this fable by Aesop.
http://tinyurl.com/weather-or-not *
Its much more realistic that your world.
On 24/01/2010 11:15 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
> Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ wrote:
>> Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of
>> money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the
>> production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so,
>> say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and
>> Communism...
> Jonno is that you again? What have you been smoking this time?
> David
--
Posted by Jonno on January 25, 2010, 1:43 am
No it wasnt me. I would tell you.....I don't smoke. You're pernicious
David...
The history sounds right. But the facts may have changed...
DHS >Acronym for Dickhead you should delve into history a bit more.
Its got most of the facts I know about this about right.
But who can say history isn't made up? This guy may be right...
This is my contribution. A fun read....
Concerned Australians
THE FIFTY DOLLAR NOTE
by Dennis Collins
A travelling salesman booked a room at a hotel in a little country
town, paid with a $50 note on which was some purple texta scribble,
and went off on his business
The Hotelier, things being quiet took the $50 note to the butcher and paid
off a meat bill. The butcher took the $50 note to the grocer and reduced
his debt to the grocer by that amount. The grocer took the $50 note to the
boot mender and paid for shoe repairs for himself and his family. The boot
repairer took the $50 note to the Hotelier to pay for some beer he had on
credit.
Just then the travelling salesman came in saying he couldn't stay the
night and could he have his $50 back. He is given the same texta marked
$50 note he originally gave the hotelier, and is told the story of the
series of debts which had been paid by that particular note. The salesman
smiled and said "Isn't that remarkable, and even more so because the note
is a forgery."
This forged note had in effect allowed conveniently:
The Hotelier to barter beer for meat.
The Butcher to barter meat for groceries.
The Grocer to barter groceries for shoe repairs.
The Bootmaker to barter shoe repair service for beer.
The forged $50 note simply acted as a common medium of exchange that made
the transactions simple and allowed commerce (the exchange of goods and
services) to flow easily.
The same thing could have been done with a cash
cheque even if the cheque was written against no funds just as long as
nobody banked it.
Money ought to be like the forged $50 note in the story - a servant. The
problem with our current money system relates to:
Who is creating our money
How they put it into circulation
How they remove it from circulation.
The current money system - basically 3,000 years old, uses money to
enslave through debt, and not to serve society as it should.
Food for thought.
On 24/01/2010 11:15 PM, David Hare-Scott wrote:
> Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ wrote:
>> Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of
>> money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the
>> production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so,
>> say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and
>> Communism...
> Jonno is that you again? What have you been smoking this time?
> David
--
Posted by Jonno on January 24, 2010, 8:33 pm
No it wasnt me. I would tell you.....I dont smoke. You pernicous David...
The history sounds right. But the facts may have changed...
DHS >Acronym for Dickheads should delve into history a bit more.
This is my contribution. A fun read....
Concerned Australians
THE FIFTY DOLLAR NOTE
by Dennis Collins
A travelling salesman booked a room at a hotel in a little country
town, paid with a $50 note on which was some purple texta scribble,
and went off on his business
The Hotelier, things being quiet took the $50 note to the butcher and paid
off a meat bill. The butcher took the $50 note to the grocer and reduced
his debt to the grocer by that amount. The grocer took the $50 note to the
boot mender and paid for shoe repairs for himself and his family. The boot
repairer took the $50 note to the Hotelier to pay for some beer he had on
credit.
Just then the travelling salesman came in saying he couldn't stay the
night and could he have his $50 back. He is given the same texta marked
$50 note he originally gave the hotelier, and is told the story of the
series of debts which had been paid by that particular note. The salesman
smiled and said "Isn't that remarkable, and even more so because the note
is a forgery."
This forged note had in effect allowed conveniently:
The Hotelier to barter beer for meat.
The Butcher to barter meat for groceries.
The Grocer to barter groceries for shoe repairs.
The Bootmaker to barter shoe repair service for beer.
The forged $50 note simply acted as a common medium of exchange that made
the transactions simple and allowed commerce (the exchange of goods and
services) to flow easily.
The same thing could have been done with a cash
cheque even if the cheque was written against no funds just as long as
nobody banked it.
Money ought to be like the forged $50 note in the story - a servant. The
problem with our current money system relates to:
Who is creating our money
How they put it into circulation
How they remove it from circulation.
The current money system - basically 3,000 years old, uses money to
enslave through debt, and not to serve society as it should.
Food for thought.
XML site map
>> Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of
>> money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the
>> production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so,
>> say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and
>> Communism...
> Jonno is that you again? What have you been smoking this time?
> David
--